That is indeed a good point.
James
--
Dr James Cummings, Academic IT, University of Oxford
-----Original Message-----
From: Magdalena Turska [tuurma@gmail.com]
Received: Friday, 05 Feb 2016, 14:00
To: James Cummings [james.cummings@it.ox.ac.uk]; tei-council@lists.tei-c.org [tei-council@lists.tei-c.org]
Subject: Re: [tei-council] processing model use of CSS
God* forbid! I guess it should be declared once per ODD, otherwise it's just madness to allow different CSS-like language on every model/outputRendition.
[*] deity (or non-deity) of choice, actually
On 5 February 2016 at 13:52, James Cummings mailto:James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
That is with a @scheme attribute on <rendition> if I recall correctly. So should outputRendition have a @scheme attribute?
-James
On 05/02/16 13:45, Magdalena Turska wrote:
And where does one state what one uses for @rendition? Logically the same
place might be good for our purpose I guess.
M
On 5 February 2016 at 13:30, Lou Burnard mailto:lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
So where do I say in my ODd "watch out I am using SPitbol to express my
output renditiond" and how?
Sent from my Honor Mobile
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [tei-council] processing model use of CSS
From: Magdalena Turska
To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
CC:
I would go with 'b', recommended but other options possible. Perhaps
mentioning this is the only option that current implementations support,
though I do note that Guidelines are actually not mentioning implementation
at all, so won't press the issue.
Magdalena
On 5 February 2016 at 12:58, James Cummings mailto:James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
I would go with 'b', which I believe is cognate with <rendition> right?
That we recommend CSS, all our examples use it, but you can technical
use a
different formally declared style language if you wish.
Sorry I've not converted my ODDs to pure ODD yet. Will try on the train
back from Leeds tomorrow evening.
-J
On 05/02/16 12:34, Lou Burnard wrote:
Decision please. The current description of the processing model tacitly
assumes that CSS is used to express output rendition, and it's hard to
see
how else the job would be done, but the text of the Guidelines is rather
vague on the topic. Should we say
a) outputRendition *must* be expressed using CSS
b) it is *recommended* that CSS be used
c) we don't care what you use, but our examples assume you will use CSS
If we choose b or c, we will presumably need to add some complexity to
the scheme (e.g. to say what has been used instead if it's not CSS)
--
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.ukmailto:James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk Academic IT Services,
University of Oxford
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
--
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.ukmailto:James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
