Hi Raff I noticed the following problems in your ODD (a) several of your valList/valItem/@ident values are not valid XML names (e.g. they include characters like # or [ or ') : this doesnt matter to RELAXNG, but it makes life difficult for other processors (b) Your redefinition of the <line> element includes the <add> element twice. Once will do. (c) the problem with list is a nasty one. you've undeclared some elements which the default content model expects to find, leaving behind multiple sequences of 0:n model.globals. Probably the easiest solution is to redefine the content model for <list>. I'll think about that and get back to you... Lou On 05/02/16 22:18, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
The "cos-nonambig" error is still there :(
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
Excellent! Did the "cos-nonambig" error just disappear or have you not tested for that?
On 05/02/16 22:05, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
Thanks! Ok, everything is in PureODD now and all files validate.
Raff
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk wrote:
<dataRef name="string" restriction="indent\d"/>
On 05/02/16 20:24, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
Hi Lou,
I'm trying to redefine our datatypes in pure ODD, but one of them uses a regex:
<content> <rng:choice> <rng:value>right</rng:value> <rng:value>center</rng:value> <rng:value>left</rng:value> <rng:data type="string"> <rng:param name="pattern">indent\d</rng:param> </rng:data> </rng:choice> </content>
I understand I can use <valList> for the first three values, but what about the last one?
Thanks, Raff
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
Come come you're too modest : what about that thing called um, what was
it, dimple, or pimple, or something?
On 05/02/16 16:03, Magdalena Turska wrote:
I'm a bit ashamed but indeed I do not have ODDs of my own to test.
> On 5 February 2016 at 15:56, Raffaele Viglianti < > raffaeleviglianti@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Lou, >> >> I converted the Shelley Godwin Archive ODD to PureODD last week. >> Sorry >> for >> not following up sooner. >> >> The ODD is here: >> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/umd-mith/sga/blob/master/data/odd/shelley-godwin-page.odd >> >> Everything seems to work fine, but I have two comments / questions: >> >> 1) Datatypes (macroSpec[@type='dt']) are still defined in RNG, >> correct? >> We >> define some custom datatypes in our ODD and I still had to use RNG >> >> 2) The XSD that gets generated returns a "cos-nonambig" error on >> tei:list. >> We don't touch tei:ist in the ODD however. We have always only >> generated >> RNG, so I'm not sure whether this problem is new (ie caused by Pure >> ODD, >> or >> it's always been there) >> >> I hope to find the time to give a stab at the MEI ODD too (that will >> be >> fun), but I will need a converter script there, because it's a *huge* >> ODD. >> >> Raff >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Lou Burnard < >> lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >> I haven't heard from anyone since I asked Council members to check >> that >> >> their existing ODDs continue to work as expected using the >>> lb42-pureodd >>> branch. So maybe no Council members actually have any ODDs to check, >>> or >>> maybe those who do have all checked and have nothing to report, or >>> maybe >>> they just haven't got round to it yet. I don't know, but just in >>> case >>> >>> it's >>> >> the 3rd possibility, please could I urge you to give it a go this >> >>> weekend? >>> >> If you prefer, you could just bung me a copy of the ODD and I'll test >> >>> it >>> for you! >>> >>> Why the pressure? Well, mostly that I've just been reminded that >>> we're >>> aiming for a pre-release freeze for the end of the current month, >>> and >>> I'm >>> going to be buried in the French countryside with only intermittent >>> net >>> access until then. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> tei-council mailing list >>> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >>> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >>> >>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >>> >>> -- >>> >>> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >> >> >> -- >> > tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived