I don't care from a political perspective, but it seems fair to alternate
like James has suggested. I certainly wouldn't mind having to do a trip
less across the ocean, also considering that I'll be back in Europe at the
end of May for a conference. So my motivations this time are ultimately
self-centered :)
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Hugh Cayless
I don't care a bit. I suspect the practicalities of any particular occasion/location will outweigh the politics.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Martin Holmes
wrote: On 15-02-02 08:33 AM, Fabio Ciotti wrote:
Maybe we should ask the Board for guidance on whether to prefer political
niceness over economic interest?
Agree, we should think to a sort of organizational policy document. In the end deciding to have a meeting in US and another in EU is a political choice.
It may be a political choice for Council, rather than the Board or the community as a whole, though. If none of the North American Council members would be hurt or put out by having two meetings in Europe, then it seems to me that it's no issue; it's not the same as the Members Meeting.
I don't care myself. Does anyone else in NA care?
Cheers, Martin
f
--
tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived