Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting

I don't think that's an insurmountable problem... :-) On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Paul Schaffner wrote:

The only problem I can think of with Saturday is that the library doors don't open till 10 am (M-F it's 8). So if we were meeting in the library, we'd have to start later on Saturday. Which might not be a terrible thing. pfs

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 11:41, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

The preponderance of votes was for 28-30 I think, and even for the earlier meeting in Durham, most people seemed to want a Thursday–Saturday meeting, so unless Paul has any reasons why that wouldn't work, let's say Ann Arbor, May 28-30.

Any objections?

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...

I think the poll indicates, fwiw, two possible dates for Ann Arbor, both of which might be described as "end of May", i.e. 27-29 May, and 28-30 May.

Could we perhaps make a decision now? I have a preference for 28-30 may, fwiw, but can live with either. I can even live with the rival suggestion of Durham for 30-may2 if need be. The thing I cannot endure much longer is this protracted uncertainty ....

On 16/02/15 13:09, Paul Schaffner wrote:

...

As I suggested in a previous message, perhaps obscurely, I think that a date at the end of April or beginning of May would be next to impossible because it would coincide with the University graduation week/end, making it verra difficult to find a hotel room, much less ten or so. So if held here, it would have to be the later date (end of May, that is), simply as a logistical question.

pfs

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015, at 10:06, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

I think we have a winner then. We have more votes for Ann Arbour, but we're evenly split as to date—5 for end of April, 5 for end of May. Paul hasn't voted yet, and as local organizer, I think it's appropriate that he have the deciding vote as to date. Paul, what works best for you?

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Fabio Ciotti < fabio.ciotti@uniroma2.it> wrote:

I've cast my vote, but since we abandoned the idea to have the meeting

...

in Boston at the end of April I have no deep preference for the location and the exact dates.

f

2015-02-14 12:50 GMT+01:00 Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk>:

> exactly. a vote for anything other than the two majority parties is a > vote wasted.

> > Sent from Samsung Mobile > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Stefan Majewski > Date: 14/02/2015 11:47 (GMT+00:00) > To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > Subject: Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting > > > But then, with a pick one choice, it's not much use of picking one of > the > infrequent choices, even when all others would be happy with this as > well.

> In any case, if it's a method to agree on something rather soon it will > be

> okay. > > Cheers, > Stefan > Am 14.02.2015 01:03 schrieb "Hugh Cayless" > I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear >> > winner

> or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice. >> >> Sent from my phone. >> >> On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman

...

...

...

...

>>> >> wrote:

> Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how >>> it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a >>> mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. >>> But really, would be fine with Durham, too. >>> >>> Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's >>>> just choose a date and place" poll at >>>> http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all >>>> about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward >>>> Durham at the end of April. >>>> >>>> I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. >>>> >>> -- >>> tei-council mailing list >>> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >>> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >>> >>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >>> >> -- >> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >> >> -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- Paul Schaffner Digital Library Production Service PFSchaffner@umich.edu | http://www.umich.edu/~pfs/

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived