Mr. Jenkins is happy. Pushed – tested – closed!

Thanks!

Martina

Von: Peter Stadler <stadler@edirom.de>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2018 18:56
An: Scholger, Martina (martina.scholger@uni-graz.at) <martina.scholger@uni-graz.at>; TEI Council <tei-council@lists.tei-c.org>
Betreff: Re: [Tei-council] back to normal

Yes, adding <pc> to the content models of <entry> and <hom> directly (the way you propose) seems to be the way.

Just try it and give Jenkins something to chew!

Best

Peter

Am 18.07.2018 um 00:42 schrieb Scholger, Martina (martina.scholger@uni-graz.at) <martina.scholger@uni-graz.at>:

Hi,

Jenkins is back to normal. I’ve undone the changes in <pc> for the moment.

But my question from my previous email still remains. Are there any thoughts on that?

Best,

Martina

Von: Tei-council <tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org> Im Auftrag von Scholger, Martina (martina.scholger@uni-graz.at)
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Juli 2018 18:56
An: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
Betreff: [Tei-council] build failed #1702

Hi all,

I was working on issue https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1702 today and caused a failure by making <pc> a member of model.entryPart.top (seehttps://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/6bc78db838754ba27d8adbbf2878c511570c48cb).

The reason is that there is an ambiguous content model. <sense> and <re> both already use model.phrase, which has <pc> provided by model.segLike (thanks to James and Peter for helping me with this).

Eg. the content model for  <sense> is

<content>

 <alternate minOccurs="0"

  maxOccurs="unbounded">

  <textNode/>

  <classRef key="model.gLike"/>

  <elementRef key="sense"/>

  <classRef key="model.entryPart.top"/>

  <classRef key="model.phrase"/>

  <classRef key="model.global"/>

</alternate>

</content>

I think the content model for <entry> should be (see addition in bold):  

<content>

 <alternate minOccurs="0"

  maxOccurs="unbounded">

  <textNode/>

  <elementRef key="hom" />

  <elementRef key="sense" />

<elementRef key="pc" />

  <classRef key="model.entryPart.top"/>

  <classRef key="model.global"/>

  <classRef key="model.ptrLike"/>

 </alternate>

</content>

And for <hom> this should be (see addition in bold):

<content>

 <alternate minOccurs="0"

  maxOccurs="unbounded">

  <elementRef key="sense" />

<elementRef key="pc" />

  <classRef key="model.entryPart.top"/>

  <classRef key="model.global"/>

 </alternate>

</content>

And for <pc>:

delete <memberOf key=”model.entryPart.top” /> which I added today and which caused the problem.

Jenkins didn’t complain when I added <memberOf key=”model.entryPart.top” /> to <lbl>, so I wouldn’t change that.

My question is now – is that the way to go or is there a better way?

Best,

Martina

Mag. Dr. Martina Scholger

Zentrum für Informationsmodellierung

Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities

Universität Graz

A-8010 Graz | Elisabethstraße 59/III

+43 316 380 2291

martina.scholger@uni-graz.at

http://informationsmodellierung.uni-graz.at | http://gams.uni-graz.at

Institut für Dokumentologie und Editorik e.V. | https://www.i-d-e.de/

Chair of the TEI Technical Council | http://www.tei-c.org/

_______________________________________________
Tei-council mailing list
Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
_______________________________________________
Tei-council mailing list
Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council