Currently the ReleaseNotes/readme-4.2.0.xml is just a long pretty much unsorted list of changes of we have made. I am wondering if these shouldn’t at least be listed in a semi-intelligent order, if not actually divided into separate sub-lists (something like “major changes” for <ruby> and <persPronouns>; “important changes” for <citeStructure> and <noteGrp>; and “other noteworthy changes” for everything else).

I think this is a good idea, but I also think the discussion necessary to get consensus on the correct order or grouping might be prohibitive.

---