I'd say go for it. Wording changes can be pondered at length after the
initial release; there will probably be a flurry of minor FRs once this
hits the streets.

Cheers,
Martin

On 2020-02-03 12:38 p.m., Syd Bauman wrote:
> With great thanks to Peter, Martin, and Martina the changes have been
> reviewed. I've addressed almost all the issues mentioned (still
> hoping someone can come up with better wording than "makes explicit
> the multiplicity of the collection").
>
> Mr. Jenkins is happy with the sydb-standOff branch, and it builds
> fine locally on my machine here. (Not perfectly, but no worse than
> the dev branch.)-:
>
> So I think perhaps it is time to wrap in the sydb-standOff branch
> into dev, yes? Any objections?
>
_______________________________________________
Tei-council mailing list
Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council