If no one else has time to test this (which I agree with Raff is a priority), I'll do so before Friday afternoon.

Many thanks,
James

--
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@newcastle.ac.uk
School of English Literature, Language, and Linguistics, Newcastle University

From: Tei-council <tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org> on behalf of Raffaele Viglianti <raffaeleviglianti@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 10:44:20 PM
To: Bauman, Syd
Cc: TEI Council
Subject: Re: [Tei-council] priorities
 
Sorry to add fuel to the fire, but I have also just sent a very simple PR to generate different p5subset.json files for each supported languages. If this gets included in the release, the Vault will have all the data needed for Roma (beta). If not, I'll keep pulling data from my server until the next release.

I tested locally and got the output I expected, but it would be great to have someone else look it over and merge it into dev. https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/pull/1890

Best,
Raff

On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 5:51 PM Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu> wrote:
EBB> For right now, it seems a higher priority to resolve the
EBB> release-blocking problems on dev connected with simplePrint.odd
EBB> ..., doesn't it?

Well, yes, but the question is whether *I* should be tackling the
nesting-<TEI> issue (for which I will find the schema changes easy,
but the prose changes will take me a long time because I'm slow at
that sort of stuff), or the stylesheet problems. (If someone else is
already 1/2-way to fixing it, speak up! :-)


HC> It would be a bit of a shame to lose it. I could work on it when
HC> I’m back home this weekend. Or on the plane on Friday for that
HC> matter...

Thanks. Might be a good idea. Although to be fair, we would not be
losing it, just not tucking it in until next release. (When,
honestly, it might make a bit more sense, anyway.)


MS> ... my understanding was that we already decided on the nesting
MS> TEI element, regardless of the deprecation of teiCorpus.

Right; I'm just talking about timing, not whether-or-not. (And in
part, timing so we can get feedback from community.)


MS> I am aware that we agreed on having LR propose this to the list,
MS> but on second thought my feeling is that such a suggestion should
MS> better be coming from the Council. I would therefore suggest that
MS> I draft an email to the list and circulate it to you.

My thought is "go, girl!". But perhaps the right thing to do is for
you to write up a draft, and send it to LR as well as to us so that
he can chime in, too?


EBB> It isn’t looking as if this sent, so I am trying again...

I had gotten it just fine.
_______________________________________________
Tei-council mailing list
Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council