Dear Peter and Andrew,
the current draft of the DHARMA encoding guide says <space type="hole">
which is also the way I handled copperplate binding holes in the Siddham
corpus. I prefer the simpler "hole" to the more cumbersome "binding-hole"
but if you, Andrew, have already used "binding-hole" a lot and would prefer
this more accurate term, please convince me to adopt it for use in DHARMA.
(Fyi, I our guide prescribes <space type="defect"> for all spaces left
blank due to physical defects in the surface, so "hole" is not in my
opinion ambiguous.)
Best,
Dan
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 19:14, Andrew Ollett
I use <space type="binding-hole"/>. I am not sure what the current recommendation in major projects (e.g. DHARMA).
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 12:12 PM Peter Mukunda Pasedach < peter.pasedach@googlemail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
how do you represent string holes in TEI transcripts of palm-leaf manuscripts?
Best,
Peter _______________________________________________ Indic-texts mailing list Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/indic-texts
_______________________________________________ Indic-texts mailing list Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/indic-texts