The use of <space type="binding-hole"/> is also used in EIAD. The term binding-hole is sufficiently broad to be applicable both to inscriptions and to manuscripts. I recommend keeping it in lieu of simply <space type="hole"/> because anyone may forget at any time that there is also <space type="defect">, and so, in my view, <space type="hole"/> is too ambiguous.
Best wishes,
Arlo
Le 7 oct. 2019 à 19:44, Dániel Balogh mailto:danbalogh@gmail.com> a écrit :
Dear Peter and Andrew,
the current draft of the DHARMA encoding guide says <space type="hole"> which is also the way I handled copperplate binding holes in the Siddham corpus. I prefer the simpler "hole" to the more cumbersome "binding-hole" but if you, Andrew, have already used "binding-hole" a lot and would prefer this more accurate term, please convince me to adopt it for use in DHARMA. (Fyi, I our guide prescribes <space type="defect"> for all spaces left blank due to physical defects in the surface, so "hole" is not in my opinion ambiguous.)
Best,
Dan
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 19:14, Andrew Ollett mailto:andrew.ollett@gmail.com> wrote:
I use <space type="binding-hole"/>. I am not sure what the current recommendation in major projects (e.g. DHARMA).
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 12:12 PM Peter Mukunda Pasedach mailto:peter.pasedach@googlemail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
how do you represent string holes in TEI transcripts of palm-leaf manuscripts?
Best,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Indic-texts mailing list
Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/indic-texts
_______________________________________________
Indic-texts mailing list
Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/indic-texts
_______________________________________________
Indic-texts mailing list
Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.orgmailto:Indic-texts@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/indic-texts
